Notion pricing
Notion plans observed on 2026-10-18 at www.notion.com/pricing: Free EUR 0 per seat per month, Plus EUR 9.5 per seat per month and Business EUR 19.5 per seat per month. A price is an observation on a day, not a fact that gets replaced.
Notion plans and prices
| Line | Latest | Observed | Assessment | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business seat per month |
EUR 19.5
Verified |
2026-10-18 | Matches the average of prices observed in the last 90 days, EUR 19.50 (35 observations over 46 days). This is the lowest price we have recorded, first seen 2026-09-02. | 35 |
| Plus seat per month |
EUR 9.5
Verified |
2026-10-18 | Matches the average of prices observed in the last 90 days, EUR 9.50 (35 observations over 46 days). This is the lowest price we have recorded, first seen 2026-09-02. | 35 |
| Free seat per month |
EUR 0
Verified |
2026-10-18 | NaN% above the average of prices observed in the last 90 days, EUR 0.00 (35 observations over 46 days). This is the lowest price we have recorded, first seen 2026-09-02. | 35 |
Price-related attributes
USD entry price per month not recorded; the observed prices above are in EUR.
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price per month | Not yet verified | Not yet verified Checked 1 address (35 reads), most recently on 2026-10-18: www.notion.com/pricing EvidenceNotePrecision review 2026-09-02: the excerpt did not document this value (extractor muster:(?<![\d.])\$(?<![\d.])(\d{1,5})(?![\d])\s*(?:/|per\s+)month). See daten/messungen. Sourcehttps://www.notion.com/pricing · Primary documentation · checked 35 times from 2026-09-02 to 2026-10-18, nothing found at this address · every date HistoryStatement history How it was read Read bysection check; the page is shared by several products and this task has no section anchor First observed2026-09-02 Last checked2026-10-18 |
| Free tier | Yes | Verified90% confidence www.notion.com/pricing (Primary documentation), retrieved 2026-09-02 EvidenceExcerpt ...ragraphs, bullet points, etc.). Teams who want to try collaborating in Notion can use the Free Plan with up to certain number of blocks before upgrading. Pages & blocks Unlimited for indivi... Excerpt kindrunning text Subject named in excerptyes Sourcehttps://www.notion.com/pricing · Primary documentation · retrieved 2026-09-02 Confidence90% - the source confidence; no cap applies (not a text extraction) HistoryStatement history How it was read First observed2026-09-02 Last checked2026-09-02 Later reads75 later reads of its source (last on 2026-10-18) could not be attributed to this subject: the address is now shared by several products and is not read without a section anchor. The statement stands on the earlier read. Human reviewnot documented Source confidence90% Reader precisionnot yet measured Excerpt-kind precision85% (measured by hand over 417 statements of this kind) Confidence interpretationA heuristic informed by source assessment and reader samples, not a calibrated probability that this individual claim is correct. |
| Public list price | Yes | Verified90% confidence www.notion.com/pricing (Primary documentation), retrieved 2026-09-02 EvidenceExcerpt ...is that single place. Nick Erdenberger GTM, OpenAI Watch video → Plans and features Free €0 per seat/month Sign up Plus €9.50 per seat/month Get started Business €19.50 per seat/month Get st... Excerpt kindrunning text Subject named in excerptno Sourcehttps://www.notion.com/pricing · Primary documentation · retrieved 2026-09-02 Confidence90% - the source confidence; no cap applies (not a text extraction) HistoryStatement history How it was read First observed2026-09-02 Last checked2026-09-02 Later reads75 later reads of its source (last on 2026-10-18) could not be attributed to this subject: the address is now shared by several products and is not read without a section anchor. The statement stands on the earlier read. Human reviewnot documented Source confidence90% Reader precisionnot yet measured Excerpt-kind precision79% (measured by hand over 857 statements of this kind) Confidence interpretationA heuristic informed by source assessment and reader samples, not a calibrated probability that this individual claim is correct. |