Comparison
Joplin vs Obsidian
Compare the facts. Check the scope. Choose what fits.
- Documented differences
- 0
- Same documented value
- 3
- Need more evidence
- 18
At a glance
Differences, not an overall rankingThe comparable values we have documented are the same. Open research gaps before drawing a conclusion.
Explore the evidence
Open a row for sources and plan limitsNo differences are documented on both sides yet. Check the research gaps or select All.
No comparable values are documented on both sides yet. Select Research gaps or All.
No research gaps in these criteria. Select Documented or All to see the values.
Pricing
Sources for this row
The Joplin note-taking application is free. Hosted Joplin Cloud is a separate offering; this statement does not describe a free cloud subscription.
Obsidian is free for personal, commercial and non-profit use. Supporter licences are optional; Sync and Publish are separate services.
Security and compliance
Platform and integration
Sources for this row
The local Data API exposes notes, notebooks and tags when the clipper server is running, using an authentication token. This is a desktop-local API, not an unrestricted hosted service.
Sources for this row
JEX export preserves notes and metadata for re-import into Joplin. Other documented formats include HTML and PDF; their preservation properties differ.
Sources for this row
The application is available on Android and iOS, as well as Windows, Linux and macOS.
Obsidian Mobile is available on iOS and Android. Cross-device sync is a separate choice from installing the mobile application.
Sources for this row
Joplin keeps notes on the phone or computer and documents an offline-first workflow. Synchronising changes between devices still needs a connection.
Obsidian stores notes on the local device and documents offline access. Access to synced updates from another device requires a connection.